summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/essays/introduction.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorphoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>2024-05-15 00:56:25 -0400
committerphoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>2024-05-15 00:56:25 -0400
commit0a8175b85fb964bf1e06f31b794c8f08f72c3054 (patch)
treea491bfdd0e1c9381b54b4421a0db62d203c07f81 /essays/introduction.tex
parent9197a7ef6be5f906dc88e6c377756216df64bce1 (diff)
downloadblueprint-0a8175b85fb964bf1e06f31b794c8f08f72c3054.tar.gz
rev to flaws & final fixes of intro
Diffstat (limited to 'essays/introduction.tex')
-rw-r--r--essays/introduction.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/essays/introduction.tex b/essays/introduction.tex
index 9890bda..721d241 100644
--- a/essays/introduction.tex
+++ b/essays/introduction.tex
@@ -168,13 +168,13 @@ which is useful irrespective of whether one likes it; that is, which is useful
independently of whether it produces emotional gratification.
We can now consider the following principle. \enquote{spontaneously and
-without any prompting to sweep human culture aside and to carry out
+without any prompting: to sweep human culture aside and to carry out
elaborate, completely self-justifying activities.} Relative to the social context
of the individual's activities, this principle is absurd. We have no reason to
respect the eccentric hobbyist, or the person who engages in arbitrary
antisocial acts. If an action is to have more than merely personal significance,
it must have a social justification, as is explained in On Social Recognition.
-In the light of The Flaws Underlying Beliefs and the brend theory, however,
+In the light of \essaytitle{The Flaws Underlying Beliefs} and the \term{brend} theory, however,
the principle mentioned above does become valid when it is interpreted
correctly, because it becomes necessary to invent ends as well as means. The
activity must provide an objective value, but this value will no longer be