From 0a8175b85fb964bf1e06f31b794c8f08f72c3054 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 00:56:25 -0400
Subject: rev to flaws & final fixes of intro

---
 essays/introduction.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'essays/introduction.tex')

diff --git a/essays/introduction.tex b/essays/introduction.tex
index 9890bda..721d241 100644
--- a/essays/introduction.tex
+++ b/essays/introduction.tex
@@ -168,13 +168,13 @@ which is useful irrespective of whether one likes it; that is, which is useful
 independently of whether it produces emotional gratification. 
 
 We can now consider the following principle. \enquote{spontaneously and 
-without any prompting to sweep human culture aside and to carry out 
+without any prompting: to sweep human culture aside and to carry out 
 elaborate, completely self-justifying activities.} Relative to the social context 
 of the individual's activities, this principle is absurd. We have no reason to 
 respect the eccentric hobbyist, or the person who engages in arbitrary 
 antisocial acts. If an action is to have more than merely personal significance, 
 it must have a social justification, as is explained in On Social Recognition. 
-In the light of The Flaws Underlying Beliefs and the brend theory, however, 
+In the light of \essaytitle{The Flaws Underlying Beliefs} and the \term{brend} theory, however, 
 the principle mentioned above does become valid when it is interpreted 
 correctly, because it becomes necessary to invent ends as well as means. The 
 activity must provide an objective value, but this value will no longer be 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

