diff options
| author | grr <grr@lo2.org> | 2024-05-20 18:21:13 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | grr <grr@lo2.org> | 2024-05-20 18:21:13 -0400 |
| commit | 9764e72e035adf29ba87734c1f4a88e4dfe141e3 (patch) | |
| tree | 330da0bae0a77ab049adcab1edc42011cbeb3dad | |
| parent | 914b7ae6f4fbfd0cde4f24fffad7d49c599fce99 (diff) | |
| download | blueprint-9764e72e035adf29ba87734c1f4a88e4dfe141e3.tar.gz | |
sec5 shouldnt be in toc
| -rw-r--r-- | extra/communists_must.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/extra/communists_must.tex b/extra/communists_must.tex index 206f5ce..8ee41d4 100644 --- a/extra/communists_must.tex +++ b/extra/communists_must.tex @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Two topics particularly need study. The most important is: Culture as the instru Top published studies of the finances of culture are Francis Haskell's \uline{Patrons and Painters: A Study in the Relations Between Italian Art and Society In the Age of the Baroque}; investment banker Richard H. Rush's \uline{Art As An Investment}; and bourgeois critic Harold Rosenberg's \enquote{The Art Establishment}, in Esquire, January 1965; because they elaborate with Machiavellian frankness on the relation of culture to the ruling class, for a large area of culture. These revealing studies need only be placed in context to have revolutionary implications. Unpublished material of mine which I am collecting under the title \uline{Class and the Development of Culture} will provide an adequate general theory of culture. -\section{5} +\section*{5} In many cases a reference to one of Conditions A--C has been a sufficient argument for revolutionary leadership. For example, a reference to Condition A is a sufficient argument for prefabricated architecture. |