From 9764e72e035adf29ba87734c1f4a88e4dfe141e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: grr Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:21:13 -0400 Subject: sec5 shouldnt be in toc --- extra/communists_must.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/extra/communists_must.tex b/extra/communists_must.tex index 206f5ce..8ee41d4 100644 --- a/extra/communists_must.tex +++ b/extra/communists_must.tex @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Two topics particularly need study. The most important is: Culture as the instru Top published studies of the finances of culture are Francis Haskell's \uline{Patrons and Painters: A Study in the Relations Between Italian Art and Society In the Age of the Baroque}; investment banker Richard H. Rush's \uline{Art As An Investment}; and bourgeois critic Harold Rosenberg's \enquote{The Art Establishment}, in Esquire, January 1965; because they elaborate with Machiavellian frankness on the relation of culture to the ruling class, for a large area of culture. These revealing studies need only be placed in context to have revolutionary implications. Unpublished material of mine which I am collecting under the title \uline{Class and the Development of Culture} will provide an adequate general theory of culture. -\section{5} +\section*{5} In many cases a reference to one of Conditions A--C has been a sufficient argument for revolutionary leadership. For example, a reference to Condition A is a sufficient argument for prefabricated architecture. -- cgit v1.2.3