put gioscia's dissertation over heremaster

1 files changed, 322 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/plato_time_notes.otx b/plato_time_notes.otx
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ffe8bcd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plato_time_notes.otx
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+\long\def\defpnote#1#2{
+    \long\expandafter\def\csname p:#1\endcsname{\fnote{#2}}}
+\def\pnote#1{
+   \csname p:#1\endcsname}
+
+% chapter i
+\defpnote{0.1}{A.N. Whitehead, \booktitle{Process and Reality} 
+  (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1941), p. 63.}
+\defpnote{0,2}{W.H. Walsh, 
+  \essaytitle{Plato and the Philosophy of History: History and Theory in the Republic,}
+  \journaltitle{History and Theory}
+  (The Hague: Mouton \& Co., 1962), II, 1, pp. 1--16.}
+\defpnote{0.3}{K.R. Popper,
+  \booktitle{The Open Society and its Enemies}
+  (2 vols.; 2\textsuperscript{nd} ed. rev.; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952).}
+\defpnote{0.4}{Walsh, op. cit., p. 6.}
+\defpnote{0.5}{See, for example. R.L. Nettleship, 
+\booktitle{Lectures on the Republic of Plato }
+(New York: The Macmillan Company, 
+1955), and E. Barker, 
+\booktitle{Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle}
+(New York: Dover Publications, Imnc., 1959). 
+Both of these authors make slight reference to the \booktitle{Timaeus} while discussing Plato's \dq{Political Philosophy.}}
+\defpnote{0.6}{R.G. Bury, 
+\essaytitle{Plato and History,}
+\journaltitle{Classical Quarterly,}
+New Series, 1--2, pp. 86--94.}
+\defpnote{0.7}{Edward MacKinnon, S.J., 
+\essaytitle{Time in Contemporary Physics,}
+\journaltitle{International Philosophical Quarterly,}
+II, 3, (September, 1962), p. 429.}
+\defpnote{0.8}{Hermann Gauss,
+\booktitle{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den Dialogen Platos},
+vol. III part 2 (Bern: Herbart Lang, 1961)}
+\defpnote{0.9}{Bertrand Russell, 
+\booktitle{Mysticism and Logic}
+(Garden City, New York: Doubleday \& Co., 1917). }
+\defpnote{0.10}{Whitehead, loc, cit.}
+\defpnote{0.11}{Werner Heisenberg,
+\booktitle{Physics and Philosophy}
+(New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1955), ch. 4.}
+\defpnote{0.12}{See, for example. F.M. Cornford, 
+\booktitle{From Religion to Philosophy}
+(New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1957).}
+\defpnote{0.13}{F.M. Cornford, 
+\booktitle{Plato's Cosmology},
+(London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1937), p. 8.}
+\defpnote{0.14}{Carl G. Hempel, 
+\essaytitle{Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science,}
+\booktitle{International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science},
+vols. I and IT; 
+\ul{Foundations of the Unity of Science}
+vol. II, no. 7 (University of Chicago Press, 1952)}
+\defpnote{0.15}{Hans Meyerhoff, ed., 
+\booktitle{The Philosophy of History in Our Time}
+(New York: Doubleday \& Co., 1959), 
+which contains a valuable anthology of the important authors in this field and some of their most representative views.}
+
+% chapter ii
+
+\defpnote{1.1}{A.E. Taylor, 
+\booktitle{Commentary on Plato's Timaeus}
+(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928), p. 4.}
+\defpnote{1.2}{F.M. Cornford,
+\booktitle{Plato's Cosmology},
+p. viii.}
+\defpnote{1.3}{Werner Jaeger, 
+\booktitle{Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture}
+(3 vols.; New York: Oxford University Press, 1943), II, pp. 77--78. }
+\defpnote{1.4}{Ibid., p. 78.}
+\defpnote{1.5}{Ibid., p. 79.}
+\defpnote{1.6}{C.F. Hermann, 
+\booktitle{Geschichte und System der Platonischen Philosophie}
+(Heidelberg: 1839), in Jaeger, 
+op. cit., p. 79}
+\defpnote{1.7}{Jaeger, op. cit., p. 79.}
+\defpnote{1.8}{Ibid., p. 80.}
+\defpnote{1.9}{Theodor Gompers,
+\booktitle{Greek Thinkers},
+trans. G.G. Berry 
+(London: John Murray, 1905).}
+\defpnote{1.10}{Ibid., p. 275.}
+\defpnote{1.11}{Ibid., p. 278.}
+\defpnote{1.12}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{1.13}{Ibid., pp. 279, 283.}
+\defpnote{1.14}{Ibid., p. 284.}
+\defpnote{1.15}{Ibid., p. 285.}
+\defpnote{1.16}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{1.17}{Ibid., p. 286.}
+\defpnote{1.18}{Ibid., p. 287.}
+\defpnote{1.19}{Jaeger, loc. cit.}
+\defpnote{1.20}{L. Campbell, 
+\essaytitle{Plato,}
+\booktitle{Encyclopaedia Britannica,}
+11\textsuperscript{th} ed., Vol. XXI, pp. 808--824.}
+\defpnote{1.21}{Ibid., p. 810.}
+\defpnote{1.22}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{1.23}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{1.24}{U.V. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff,
+\booktitle{Platon}, I,
+(2\textsuperscript{nd} ed.; 
+Berlin: Weidman, 1920), in Jaeger, op. cit., p. 80.}
+\defpnote{1.25}{Jaeger, op. cit., p. 84.}
+\defpnote{1.26}{A.E. Taylor, 
+\essaytitle{Plato,}
+\booktitle{Encyclopaedia Britannica},
+XVIII (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1957), 
+p. 49.}
+\defpnote{1.27}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{1.28}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 4.}
+\defpnote{1.29}{A.E. Taylor, 
+\booktitle{Plato: The Man and His Work}
+(6\textsuperscript{th} ed.; 5\textsuperscript{th} print.; New York: Meridian Books, Inc., 1959), 
+p. 346}
+\defpnote{1.30}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 4.}
+\defpnote{1.31}{Constantin Ritter, 
+\booktitle{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy},
+trans. Adam Alles (London: George Allen \& Unwin, Ltd., 1933).}
+\defpnote{1.32}{W. Lutoslawski, 
+\booktitle{Origin and Growth of Plato's Logic}
+(New York: Longmans, 1928.)}
+\defpnote{1.33}{John Burnet, 
+\booktitle{Greek Philosophy}
+(London: Macmillan \& Co., Ltd., 1914), Part I, p. 212.}
+\defpnote{1.34}{Cornford, op, cit.}
+\defpnote{1.35}{Wilamowitz, \booktitle{Platon}, I, p. 591, in Jaeger, 
+op. cit., p. 8O.}
+\defpnote{1.36}{Constantin Ritter, 
+\booktitle{Neue Untersuchungen uber Platon}
+(Munich: 1910), p. 181.}
+\defpnote{1.37}{Ritter, \booktitle{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy}, p. 9.}
+\defpnote{1.38}{Ibid., p. 27.}
+\defpnote{1.39}{Ibid., pp. 29--30.}
+\defpnote{1.40}{G.C. Field, \booktitle{Plato and His Contemporaries: A Study in Fourth-Century Life and Thought} (London: Methuen \& Co., Ltd., 1930), p. 68.}
+\defpnote{1.41}{Ross has summarized these results in tabular 
+form: see Appendix A.}
+\defpnote{1.42}{A.E. Taylor, \essaytitle{Plato,} \booktitle{Encyclopaedia Britannica}, 
+pp. 48--64.}
+\defpnote{1.43}{Field, op. cit., p. 4.}
+\defpnote{1.44}{According to Field, Plato's benefactor was 
+Archytas (Field, op. cit., p. 16), but according to 
+Gompers it was Anniceria (Gompers, op. cit., p. 261).}
+\defpnote{1.45}{Field, op. cit., p. 18.}
+\defpnote{1.46}{Gompers, op, cit., p. 261.}
+\defpnote{1.47}{Ritter, 
+\booktitle{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy},
+pp. 21--22.}
+\defpnote{1.48}{Ibid., p. 22.}
+\defpnote{1.49}{Ibid., p. 23.}
+\defpnote{1.50}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{1.51}{Ibid., p. 24.}
+\defpnote{1.52}{Ibid., p. 25.}
+\defpnote{1.53}{Ibid., pe 26.}
+\defpnote{1.54}{Ibid., p. 27.}
+\defpnote{1.55}{Ritter op. cit., pp. 329 ff.; 
+\booktitle{Untersuchungen uber Platon}
+(Stutheeres 1888), pp. 88 ff.}
+\defpnote{1.56}{J. Harward, \booktitle{The Platonic Epistles} (Cambridge: 
+The University Press, 1932).}
+\defpnote{1.57}{Harward, op, cit., p. 60.}
+\defpnote{1.58}{B. Jowett, 
+\booktitle{The Dialogues of Plato}
+(3\textsuperscript{rd} ed.; New York: Scribner, Armstrong, \& Co., 1878) preface.}
+\defpnote{1.59}{H.T. Karsten,
+\booktitle{De Epistolis quae feruntur Platonicis}
+(Utrecht: 1864), in Harward, op, cit., p. 61.}
+\defpnote{1.60}{Harward, op. cit., pp. 71--72.}
+\defpnote{1.61}{Field, op. cit., p. 16.}
+\defpnote{1.62}{Harward, op. cit., p. 76.}
+\defpnote{1.63}{Ibid., pp. 86--96.}
+\defpnote{1.64}{Ibid., p. 86.}
+\defpnote{1.65}{Ritter, 
+\booktitle{Neue Untersuchungen uber Platon}, p. 408.}
+\defpnote{1.66}{\booktitle{Tusc, Disp.} V, 35, in Harward, op. cit., p. 189.}
+\defpnote{1.67}{Harward, op. cit., p. 192.}
+\defpnote{1.68}{Not \e{learned.} Plato is talking about the 
+communication of philosophy, not the stating of it, nor 
+the acquisition of it, but the process in which, so to 
+speak, philosophy happens.}
+\defpnote{1.69}{See the Cave Allegory of the \booktitle{Republic} 507.}
+\defpnote{1.70}{i.e., it is in all probability not a posthumous 
+edition.}
+
+% ch iii
+% ch iv
+
+
+\defpnote{2.1}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Plato: The Man and His Work}, p. 2.}
+\defpnote{2.2}{Cornford, \booktitle{Plato's Cosmology}, p. 2.}
+
+\defpnote{2.3}{Gauss, \booktitle{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den Dialogen Platos}, p. 157}
+\defpnote{2.4}{Cornford, op. cit., appendix, p. 365.}
+\defpnote{2.5}{P. Frutiger, \booktitle{Les Myths de Platon}, (Paris: 1930), pp. 244 ff.}
+
+\defpnote{2.6}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 14.}
+
+\defpnote{2.7}{Q. Lauer, S.J., \essaytitle{The Being of Non-Being in Plato's Sophist} (unpublished manuscript; New York: Fordham University).}
+
+\defpnote{2.8}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 8.}
+
+\defpnote{2.9}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Plato: The Man and His Work}, p. 440.}
+\defpnote{2.10}{Cf., V.J. Gioscia, \essaytitle{A Perspective for Role Theory,} \journaltitle{The American Catholic Sociological Review,} XXII, 2 (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1961), pp. 143 ff.}
+
+\defpnote{2.11}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 24.}
+
+\defpnote{2.12}{Ibid., p. 28.}
+\defpnote{2.13}{Ibid., p. 30.}
+
+\defpnote{2.14}{Ibid., pp. 31--32.}
+
+\defpnote{2.15}{R.D. Archer-Hind, \booktitle{Commentary on the Timaeus}, (London: The Macmillan Company, 1888), p. 86, n, 14.}
+
+\defpnote{2.16}{T.T. Taylor, \booktitle{The Timaeus and Critias of Plato},
+(Washington: Pantheon Books Inc., 1952), p. 112. }
+
+\defpnote{2.17}{Ibid., p. 17.}
+
+\defpnote{2.18}{Bury, \booktitle{Plato and History},\ednote{book or essay?} p. 5.}
+
+\defpnote{2.19}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 73.}
+
+\defpnote{2.20}{Ibid.}
+\defpnote{2.21}{Ibid., p. 74.}
+\defpnote{2.22}{Ibid.}
+
+\defpnote{2.23}{Ibid., p. 19.}
+\defpnote{2.24}{Cornford, op. cit., p. x.}
+\defpnote{2.25}{Ibid., pp. 11--12.}
+
+% ch 5
+\defpnote{3.1}{Cornford, \booktitle{Plato's Cosmology}, p. 31.}
+
+\defpnote{3.2}{One is tempted to restore the hiatus which Cornford habitually tries to remove as \dq{intolerable.} Then the passage would read, \dq{he desired that all things should come as near as possible to being, like himself.}}
+
+\defpnote{3.3}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 37.}
+
+\defpnote{3.4}{Ibid., p. 78.}
+
+\defpnote{3.5}{T.T. Taylor, 
+\booktitle{The Timaeus and Critias of Plato}, pp. 29 ff.}
+
+\defpnote{3.6}{e.g., Alexandre Koyre, \booktitle{From the Closed World to the
+Infinite Universe}, (New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1958).}
+
+\defpnote{3.7}{E.R. Dodds, \booktitle{The Greeks and the Irrational}
+(Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).}
+
+\defpnote{3.8}{George S. Claghorn, \booktitle{Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's 
+\sq{Timaeus}} (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1954), p. 87.}
+
+\defpnote{3.9}{Cornford, op, cit., p. 59.}
+\defpnote{3.10}{Ibid., p. 61.}
+\defpnote{3.11}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 128.}
+
+\defpnote{3.12}{Cornford, loc. cit., "Kinds" is a peculiar expression which is repeated here only to assure an accurate representation of Cornford's view.}
+
+\defpnote{3.13}{T.T. Taylor, op. cit., \essaytitle{Introduction.}}
+\defpnote{3.14}{According to T.T. Taylor, loc. cit.}
+\defpnote{3.15}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, Appendix.}
+\defpnote{3.16}{Heisenberg, \booktitle{Physics and Philosophy}, ch. 4. See 
+also MacKinnon, \booktitle{Time in Contemporary Physics}, pp. 428--457.}
+
+\defpnote{3.17}{Dodds, op. cit.}
+\defpnote{3.18}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 113.}
+
+\defpnote{3.19}{A.E. Taylor, Cornford, Archer-Hind, Bury.}
+
+\defpnote{3.20}{Cornford has \dq{So.}}
+
+\defpnote{3.21}{Cornford, op. cit.}
+
+\defpnote{3.22}{They do not really wander; see \booktitle{Laws} 822a.}
+\defpnote{3.23}{Cornford has \dq{circuits.}}
+
+% ch6
+
+{4.1}{For example, in his chapter on the doctrine of the 
+Timaeus, Ross (W.D. Ross, \booktitle{Plato's Theory of Ideas}
+(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951).) discusses the role of 
+Time not at all.}
+
+{4.2}{Gauss, \booktitle{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den 
+Dialogen Platos}, p. 157.}
+
+
+
+{4.3}{Jowett, \booktitle{The Dialogues of Plato}, II, pp. 456--7.}
+
+{4.4}{Bury, \essaytitle{Plato and History,}\ednote{essay or book?} p. 5.}
+
+{4.5}{Walsh, \booktitle{Plato and the Philosophy of History}. See 
+also Barker, \booktitle{Political thought of Plato and Aristotle},
+Nettleship, \booktitle{Lectures on the Republic of Plato}, 
+Popper, \booktitle{The Open Society and its Enemies}, and numerous 
+anthologies which present Plato's \booktitle{Republic} but seldom if 
+ever present the \booktitle{Timaeus}.}
+
+{4.6}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, pp. 689 ff.}
+{4.7}{J.F. Callahan, \booktitle{Four Views of Time in Ancient 
+Philosophy} (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1948), 
+rightly says that A.E. Taylor errs here because of his 
+adoption of Aristotle's notion of Time.}
+
+{4.8}{There are several aspects of Plato's discussion 
+of Time and Society which bear a marked resemblance to 
+some aspects of the philosophy of Anaximander, but a 
+discription of these similarities and differences would 
+require a lengthy discussion which would take us into 
+the origin of Plato's doctrines, whereas it is only our 
+purpose here to present and examine Plato's doctrine. 
+For example, while it would be instructive to investigate 
+the extent of Plato's indebtedness to Anaximander's 
+dark saying about the reparation which things offer in 
+Time for their injustices, (see, for example, John 
+Burnet, \booktitle{Early Greek Philosophy} (4\textsuperscript{th} ed.; London: Adam 
+and Charles Black; New York: Tne Macmillan Co., 1930), 
+pp. 52--53.) it would necessitate more comment than 
+we have room to present here.}
+
+% appendix
+{A.1}{W.D. Ross, \booktitle{Plato's Theory of Ideas} (Oxford: 
+Clarendon Press, 1951), p. 2.}
\ No newline at end of file