path: root/plato_time_notes.otx

% chapter i
\defpnote{0.1}{A.N. Whitehead, \bt{Process and Reality} 
  (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1941), p. 63.}
\defpnote{0,2}{W.H. Walsh, 
  \et{Plato and the Philosophy of History: History and Theory in the Republic,}
  \jt{History and Theory}
  (The Hague: Mouton \& Co., 1962), II, 1, pp. 1--16.}
\defpnote{0.3}{K.R. Popper,
  \bt{The Open Society and its Enemies}
  (2 vols.; 2\tss{nd} ed. rev.; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952).}
\defpnote{0.4}{Walsh, op. cit., p. 6.}
\defpnote{0.5}{See, for example. R.L. Nettleship, 
\bt{Lectures on the Republic of Plato }
(New York: The Macmillan Company, 
1955), and E. Barker, 
\bt{Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle}
(New York: Dover Publications, Imnc., 1959). 
Both of these authors make slight reference to the \bt{Timaeus} while discussing Plato's \dq{Political Philosophy.}}
\defpnote{0.6}{R.G. Bury, 
\et{Plato and History,}
\jt{Classical Quarterly,}
New Series, 1--2, pp. 86--94.}
\defpnote{0.7}{Edward MacKinnon, S.J., 
\et{Time in Contemporary Physics,}
\jt{International Philosophical Quarterly,}
II, 3, (September, 1962), p. 429.}
\defpnote{0.8}{Hermann Gauss,
\bt{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den Dialogen Platos},
vol. III part 2 (Bern: Herbart Lang, 1961)}
\defpnote{0.9}{Bertrand Russell, 
\bt{Mysticism and Logic}
(Garden City, New York: Doubleday \& Co., 1917). }
\defpnote{0.10}{Whitehead, loc, cit.}
\defpnote{0.11}{Werner Heisenberg,
\bt{Physics and Philosophy}
(New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1955), ch. 4.}
\defpnote{0.12}{See, for example. F.M. Cornford, 
\bt{From Religion to Philosophy}
(New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1957).}
\defpnote{0.13}{F.M. Cornford, 
\bt{Plato's Cosmology},
(London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1937), p. 8.}
\defpnote{0.14}{Carl G. Hempel, 
\et{Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science,}
\bt{International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science},
vols. I and IT; 
\ul{Foundations of the Unity of Science}
vol. II, no. 7 (University of Chicago Press, 1952)}
\defpnote{0.15}{Hans Meyerhoff, ed., 
\bt{The Philosophy of History in Our Time}
(New York: Doubleday \& Co., 1959), 
which contains a valuable anthology of the important authors in this field and some of their most representative views.}

% chapter ii

\defpnote{1.1}{A.E. Taylor, 
\bt{Commentary on Plato's Timaeus}
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928), p. 4.}
\defpnote{1.2}{F.M. Cornford,
\bt{Plato's Cosmology},
p. viii.}
\defpnote{1.3}{Werner Jaeger, 
\bt{Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture}
(3 vols.; New York: Oxford University Press, 1943), II, pp. 77--78. }
\defpnote{1.4}{Ibid., p. 78.}
\defpnote{1.5}{Ibid., p. 79.}
\defpnote{1.6}{C.F. Hermann, 
\bt{Geschichte und System der Platonischen Philosophie}
(Heidelberg: 1839), in Jaeger, 
op. cit., p. 79}
\defpnote{1.7}{Jaeger, op. cit., p. 79.}
\defpnote{1.8}{Ibid., p. 80.}
\defpnote{1.9}{Theodor Gompers,
\bt{Greek Thinkers},
trans. G.G. Berry 
(London: John Murray, 1905).}
\defpnote{1.10}{Ibid., p. 275.}
\defpnote{1.11}{Ibid., p. 278.}
\defpnote{1.12}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{1.13}{Ibid., pp. 279, 283.}
\defpnote{1.14}{Ibid., p. 284.}
\defpnote{1.15}{Ibid., p. 285.}
\defpnote{1.16}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{1.17}{Ibid., p. 286.}
\defpnote{1.18}{Ibid., p. 287.}
\defpnote{1.19}{Jaeger, loc. cit.}
\defpnote{1.20}{L. Campbell, 
\et{Plato,}
\bt{Encyclopaedia Britannica,}
11\tss{th} ed., Vol. XXI, pp. 808--824.}
\defpnote{1.21}{Ibid., p. 810.}
\defpnote{1.22}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{1.23}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{1.24}{U.V. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff,
\bt{Platon}, I,
(2\tss{nd} ed.; 
Berlin: Weidman, 1920), in Jaeger, op. cit., p. 80.}
\defpnote{1.25}{Jaeger, op. cit., p. 84.}
\defpnote{1.26}{A.E. Taylor, 
\et{Plato,}
\bt{Encyclopaedia Britannica},
XVIII (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1957), 
p. 49.}
\defpnote{1.27}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{1.28}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, p. 4.}
\defpnote{1.29}{A.E. Taylor, 
\bt{Plato: The Man and His Work}
(6\tss{th} ed.; 5\tss{th} print.; New York: Meridian Books, Inc., 1959), 
p. 346}
\defpnote{1.30}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, p. 4.}
\defpnote{1.31}{Constantin Ritter, 
\bt{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy},
trans. Adam Alles (London: George Allen \& Unwin, Ltd., 1933).}
\defpnote{1.32}{W. Lutoslawski, 
\bt{Origin and Growth of Plato's Logic}
(New York: Longmans, 1928.)}
\defpnote{1.33}{John Burnet, 
\bt{Greek Philosophy}
(London: Macmillan \& Co., Ltd., 1914), Part I, p. 212.}
\defpnote{1.34}{Cornford, op, cit.}
\defpnote{1.35}{Wilamowitz, \bt{Platon}, I, p. 591, in Jaeger, 
op. cit., p. 8O.}
\defpnote{1.36}{Constantin Ritter, 
\bt{Neue Untersuchungen uber Platon}
(Munich: 1910), p. 181.}
\defpnote{1.37}{Ritter, \bt{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy}, p. 9.}
\defpnote{1.38}{Ibid., p. 27.}
\defpnote{1.39}{Ibid., pp. 29--30.}
\defpnote{1.40}{G.C. Field, \bt{Plato and His Contemporaries: A Study in Fourth-Century Life and Thought} (London: Methuen \& Co., Ltd., 1930), p. 68.}
\defpnote{1.41}{Ross has summarized these results in tabular 
form: see Appendix A.}
\defpnote{1.42}{A.E. Taylor, \et{Plato,} \bt{Encyclopaedia Britannica}, 
pp. 48--64.}
\defpnote{1.43}{Field, op. cit., p. 4.}
\defpnote{1.44}{According to Field, Plato's benefactor was 
Archytas (Field, op. cit., p. 16), but according to 
Gompers it was Anniceria (Gompers, op. cit., p. 261).}
\defpnote{1.45}{Field, op. cit., p. 18.}
\defpnote{1.46}{Gompers, op, cit., p. 261.}
\defpnote{1.47}{Ritter, 
\bt{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy},
pp. 21--22.}
\defpnote{1.48}{Ibid., p. 22.}
\defpnote{1.49}{Ibid., p. 23.}
\defpnote{1.50}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{1.51}{Ibid., p. 24.}
\defpnote{1.52}{Ibid., p. 25.}
\defpnote{1.53}{Ibid., pe 26.}
\defpnote{1.54}{Ibid., p. 27.}
\defpnote{1.55}{Ritter op. cit., pp. 329 ff.; 
\bt{Untersuchungen uber Platon}
(Stutheeres 1888), pp. 88 ff.}
\defpnote{1.56}{J. Harward, \bt{The Platonic Epistles} (Cambridge: 
The University Press, 1932).}
\defpnote{1.57}{Harward, op, cit., p. 60.}
\defpnote{1.58}{B. Jowett, 
\bt{The Dialogues of Plato}
(3\tss{rd} ed.; New York: Scribner, Armstrong, \& Co., 1878) preface.}
\defpnote{1.59}{H.T. Karsten,
\bt{De Epistolis quae feruntur Platonicis}
(Utrecht: 1864), in Harward, op, cit., p. 61.}
\defpnote{1.60}{Harward, op. cit., pp. 71--72.}
\defpnote{1.61}{Field, op. cit., p. 16.}
\defpnote{1.62}{Harward, op. cit., p. 76.}
\defpnote{1.63}{Ibid., pp. 86--96.}
\defpnote{1.64}{Ibid., p. 86.}
\defpnote{1.65}{Ritter, 
\bt{Neue Untersuchungen uber Platon}, p. 408.}
\defpnote{1.66}{\bt{Tusc, Disp.} V, 35, in Harward, op. cit., p. 189.}
\defpnote{1.67}{Harward, op. cit., p. 192.}
\defpnote{1.68}{Not \e{learned.} Plato is talking about the 
communication of philosophy, not the stating of it, nor 
the acquisition of it, but the process in which, so to 
speak, philosophy happens.}
\defpnote{1.69}{See the Cave Allegory of the \bt{Republic} 507.}
\defpnote{1.70}{i.e., it is in all probability not a posthumous 
edition.}

% ch iii
% ch iv


\defpnote{2.1}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Plato: The Man and His Work}, p. 2.}
\defpnote{2.2}{Cornford, \bt{Plato's Cosmology}, p. 2.}

\defpnote{2.3}{Gauss, \bt{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den Dialogen Platos}, p. 157}
\defpnote{2.4}{Cornford, op. cit., appendix, p. 365.}
\defpnote{2.5}{P. Frutiger, \bt{Les Myths de Platon}, (Paris: 1930), pp. 244 ff.}

\defpnote{2.6}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 14.}

\defpnote{2.7}{Q. Lauer, S.J., \et{The Being of Non-Being in Plato's Sophist} (unpublished manuscript; New York: Fordham University).}

\defpnote{2.8}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 8.}

\defpnote{2.9}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Plato: The Man and His Work}, p. 440.}
\defpnote{2.10}{Cf., V.J. Gioscia, \et{A Perspective for Role Theory,} \jt{The American Catholic Sociological Review,} XXII, 2 (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1961), pp. 143 ff.}

\defpnote{2.11}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 24.}

\defpnote{2.12}{Ibid., p. 28.}
\defpnote{2.13}{Ibid., p. 30.}

\defpnote{2.14}{Ibid., pp. 31--32.}

\defpnote{2.15}{R.D. Archer-Hind, \bt{Commentary on the Timaeus}, (London: The Macmillan Company, 1888), p. 86, n, 14.}

\defpnote{2.16}{T.T. Taylor, \bt{The Timaeus and Critias of Plato},
(Washington: Pantheon Books Inc., 1952), p. 112. }

\defpnote{2.17}{Ibid., p. 17.}

\defpnote{2.18}{Bury, \bt{Plato and History},\ednote{book or essay?} p. 5.}

\defpnote{2.19}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, p. 73.}

\defpnote{2.20}{Ibid.}
\defpnote{2.21}{Ibid., p. 74.}
\defpnote{2.22}{Ibid.}

\defpnote{2.23}{Ibid., p. 19.}
\defpnote{2.24}{Cornford, op. cit., p. x.}
\defpnote{2.25}{Ibid., pp. 11--12.}

% ch 5
\defpnote{3.1}{Cornford, \bt{Plato's Cosmology}, p. 31.}

\defpnote{3.2}{One is tempted to restore the hiatus which Cornford habitually tries to remove as \dq{intolerable.} Then the passage would read, \dq{he desired that all things should come as near as possible to being, like himself.}}

\defpnote{3.3}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, p. 37.}

\defpnote{3.4}{Ibid., p. 78.}

\defpnote{3.5}{T.T. Taylor, 
\bt{The Timaeus and Critias of Plato}, pp. 29 ff.}

\defpnote{3.6}{e.g., Alexandre Koyre, \bt{From the Closed World to the
Infinite Universe}, (New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1958).}

\defpnote{3.7}{E.R. Dodds, \bt{The Greeks and the Irrational}
(Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).}

\defpnote{3.8}{George S. Claghorn, \bt{Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's 
\sq{Timaeus}} (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1954), p. 87.}

\defpnote{3.9}{Cornford, op, cit., p. 59.}
\defpnote{3.10}{Ibid., p. 61.}
\defpnote{3.11}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, p. 128.}

\defpnote{3.12}{Cornford, loc. cit., "Kinds" is a peculiar expression which is repeated here only to assure an accurate representation of Cornford's view.}

\defpnote{3.13}{T.T. Taylor, op. cit., \et{Introduction.}}
\defpnote{3.14}{According to T.T. Taylor, loc. cit.}
\defpnote{3.15}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, Appendix.}
\defpnote{3.16}{Heisenberg, \bt{Physics and Philosophy}, ch. 4. See 
also MacKinnon, \bt{Time in Contemporary Physics}, pp. 428--457.}

\defpnote{3.17}{Dodds, op. cit.}
\defpnote{3.18}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, p. 113.}

\defpnote{3.19}{A.E. Taylor, Cornford, Archer-Hind, Bury.}

\defpnote{3.20}{Cornford has \dq{So.}}

\defpnote{3.21}{Cornford, op. cit.}

\defpnote{3.22}{They do not really wander; see \bt{Laws} 822a.}
\defpnote{3.23}{Cornford has \dq{circuits.}}

% ch6

{4.1}{For example, in his chapter on the doctrine of the 
Timaeus, Ross (W.D. Ross, \bt{Plato's Theory of Ideas}
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951).) discusses the role of 
Time not at all.}

{4.2}{Gauss, \bt{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den 
Dialogen Platos}, p. 157.}



{4.3}{Jowett, \bt{The Dialogues of Plato}, II, pp. 456--7.}

{4.4}{Bury, \et{Plato and History,}\ednote{essay or book?} p. 5.}

{4.5}{Walsh, \bt{Plato and the Philosophy of History}. See 
also Barker, \bt{Political thought of Plato and Aristotle},
Nettleship, \bt{Lectures on the Republic of Plato}, 
Popper, \bt{The Open Society and its Enemies}, and numerous 
anthologies which present Plato's \bt{Republic} but seldom if 
ever present the \bt{Timaeus}.}

{4.6}{A.E. Taylor, \bt{Commentary}, pp. 689 ff.}
{4.7}{J.F. Callahan, \bt{Four Views of Time in Ancient 
Philosophy} (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1948), 
rightly says that A.E. Taylor errs here because of his 
adoption of Aristotle's notion of Time.}

{4.8}{There are several aspects of Plato's discussion 
of Time and Society which bear a marked resemblance to 
some aspects of the philosophy of Anaximander, but a 
discription of these similarities and differences would 
require a lengthy discussion which would take us into 
the origin of Plato's doctrines, whereas it is only our 
purpose here to present and examine Plato's doctrine. 
For example, while it would be instructive to investigate 
the extent of Plato's indebtedness to Anaximander's 
dark saying about the reparation which things offer in 
Time for their injustices, (see, for example, John 
Burnet, \bt{Early Greek Philosophy} (4\tss{th} ed.; London: Adam 
and Charles Black; New York: Tne Macmillan Co., 1930), 
pp. 52--53.) it would necessitate more comment than 
we have room to present here.}

% appendix
{A.1}{W.D. Ross, \bt{Plato's Theory of Ideas} (Oxford: 
Clarendon Press, 1951), p. 2.}