summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'essays/admissible_contradictions.tex')
-rw-r--r--essays/admissible_contradictions.tex3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex b/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
index e95b85f..875ba55 100644
--- a/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
+++ b/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The task of the theory is to determine whether the admissibility of the
cons postulated to be am implies the admissibility of any other cons. The
method we have developed for solving such problems will be expressed as a
collection of posiulates for our theory.
-
+\begin{hangers}
\postulate{1} Given $\varphi[(x\in A),(x\in B),\ldots]$ am, where $x\in A$, $x\in B$, ... are the
restrictions on the con parameter, and given $A_1\subset A$, $B_1\subset B$, ..., where $A_1,B_1,...\neq\emptyset$, then
$\varphi[(x\in A_1),(x\in B_1),...]$ is am. This postulate is obviously
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ $C=A_1\cup B_1\cup\ldots$ .)
parameters $x$ and $y$ is am if it satisfies the postulated requirements
concerning amcons on $x$ and the postulated requirements concerning amcons
on $y$.
+\end{hangers}
The effect of all our assumptions up to now is to make parameters
totally independent. They do not interact with each other at all.