summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/plato_time_notes.otx
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'plato_time_notes.otx')
-rw-r--r--plato_time_notes.otx322
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 322 deletions
diff --git a/plato_time_notes.otx b/plato_time_notes.otx
deleted file mode 100644
index ffe8bcd..0000000
--- a/plato_time_notes.otx
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,322 +0,0 @@
-\long\def\defpnote#1#2{
- \long\expandafter\def\csname p:#1\endcsname{\fnote{#2}}}
-\def\pnote#1{
- \csname p:#1\endcsname}
-
-% chapter i
-\defpnote{0.1}{A.N. Whitehead, \booktitle{Process and Reality}
- (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1941), p. 63.}
-\defpnote{0,2}{W.H. Walsh,
- \essaytitle{Plato and the Philosophy of History: History and Theory in the Republic,}
- \journaltitle{History and Theory}
- (The Hague: Mouton \& Co., 1962), II, 1, pp. 1--16.}
-\defpnote{0.3}{K.R. Popper,
- \booktitle{The Open Society and its Enemies}
- (2 vols.; 2\textsuperscript{nd} ed. rev.; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952).}
-\defpnote{0.4}{Walsh, op. cit., p. 6.}
-\defpnote{0.5}{See, for example. R.L. Nettleship,
-\booktitle{Lectures on the Republic of Plato }
-(New York: The Macmillan Company,
-1955), and E. Barker,
-\booktitle{Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle}
-(New York: Dover Publications, Imnc., 1959).
-Both of these authors make slight reference to the \booktitle{Timaeus} while discussing Plato's \dq{Political Philosophy.}}
-\defpnote{0.6}{R.G. Bury,
-\essaytitle{Plato and History,}
-\journaltitle{Classical Quarterly,}
-New Series, 1--2, pp. 86--94.}
-\defpnote{0.7}{Edward MacKinnon, S.J.,
-\essaytitle{Time in Contemporary Physics,}
-\journaltitle{International Philosophical Quarterly,}
-II, 3, (September, 1962), p. 429.}
-\defpnote{0.8}{Hermann Gauss,
-\booktitle{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den Dialogen Platos},
-vol. III part 2 (Bern: Herbart Lang, 1961)}
-\defpnote{0.9}{Bertrand Russell,
-\booktitle{Mysticism and Logic}
-(Garden City, New York: Doubleday \& Co., 1917). }
-\defpnote{0.10}{Whitehead, loc, cit.}
-\defpnote{0.11}{Werner Heisenberg,
-\booktitle{Physics and Philosophy}
-(New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1955), ch. 4.}
-\defpnote{0.12}{See, for example. F.M. Cornford,
-\booktitle{From Religion to Philosophy}
-(New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1957).}
-\defpnote{0.13}{F.M. Cornford,
-\booktitle{Plato's Cosmology},
-(London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1937), p. 8.}
-\defpnote{0.14}{Carl G. Hempel,
-\essaytitle{Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science,}
-\booktitle{International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science},
-vols. I and IT;
-\ul{Foundations of the Unity of Science}
-vol. II, no. 7 (University of Chicago Press, 1952)}
-\defpnote{0.15}{Hans Meyerhoff, ed.,
-\booktitle{The Philosophy of History in Our Time}
-(New York: Doubleday \& Co., 1959),
-which contains a valuable anthology of the important authors in this field and some of their most representative views.}
-
-% chapter ii
-
-\defpnote{1.1}{A.E. Taylor,
-\booktitle{Commentary on Plato's Timaeus}
-(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928), p. 4.}
-\defpnote{1.2}{F.M. Cornford,
-\booktitle{Plato's Cosmology},
-p. viii.}
-\defpnote{1.3}{Werner Jaeger,
-\booktitle{Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture}
-(3 vols.; New York: Oxford University Press, 1943), II, pp. 77--78. }
-\defpnote{1.4}{Ibid., p. 78.}
-\defpnote{1.5}{Ibid., p. 79.}
-\defpnote{1.6}{C.F. Hermann,
-\booktitle{Geschichte und System der Platonischen Philosophie}
-(Heidelberg: 1839), in Jaeger,
-op. cit., p. 79}
-\defpnote{1.7}{Jaeger, op. cit., p. 79.}
-\defpnote{1.8}{Ibid., p. 80.}
-\defpnote{1.9}{Theodor Gompers,
-\booktitle{Greek Thinkers},
-trans. G.G. Berry
-(London: John Murray, 1905).}
-\defpnote{1.10}{Ibid., p. 275.}
-\defpnote{1.11}{Ibid., p. 278.}
-\defpnote{1.12}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{1.13}{Ibid., pp. 279, 283.}
-\defpnote{1.14}{Ibid., p. 284.}
-\defpnote{1.15}{Ibid., p. 285.}
-\defpnote{1.16}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{1.17}{Ibid., p. 286.}
-\defpnote{1.18}{Ibid., p. 287.}
-\defpnote{1.19}{Jaeger, loc. cit.}
-\defpnote{1.20}{L. Campbell,
-\essaytitle{Plato,}
-\booktitle{Encyclopaedia Britannica,}
-11\textsuperscript{th} ed., Vol. XXI, pp. 808--824.}
-\defpnote{1.21}{Ibid., p. 810.}
-\defpnote{1.22}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{1.23}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{1.24}{U.V. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff,
-\booktitle{Platon}, I,
-(2\textsuperscript{nd} ed.;
-Berlin: Weidman, 1920), in Jaeger, op. cit., p. 80.}
-\defpnote{1.25}{Jaeger, op. cit., p. 84.}
-\defpnote{1.26}{A.E. Taylor,
-\essaytitle{Plato,}
-\booktitle{Encyclopaedia Britannica},
-XVIII (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1957),
-p. 49.}
-\defpnote{1.27}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{1.28}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 4.}
-\defpnote{1.29}{A.E. Taylor,
-\booktitle{Plato: The Man and His Work}
-(6\textsuperscript{th} ed.; 5\textsuperscript{th} print.; New York: Meridian Books, Inc., 1959),
-p. 346}
-\defpnote{1.30}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 4.}
-\defpnote{1.31}{Constantin Ritter,
-\booktitle{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy},
-trans. Adam Alles (London: George Allen \& Unwin, Ltd., 1933).}
-\defpnote{1.32}{W. Lutoslawski,
-\booktitle{Origin and Growth of Plato's Logic}
-(New York: Longmans, 1928.)}
-\defpnote{1.33}{John Burnet,
-\booktitle{Greek Philosophy}
-(London: Macmillan \& Co., Ltd., 1914), Part I, p. 212.}
-\defpnote{1.34}{Cornford, op, cit.}
-\defpnote{1.35}{Wilamowitz, \booktitle{Platon}, I, p. 591, in Jaeger,
-op. cit., p. 8O.}
-\defpnote{1.36}{Constantin Ritter,
-\booktitle{Neue Untersuchungen uber Platon}
-(Munich: 1910), p. 181.}
-\defpnote{1.37}{Ritter, \booktitle{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy}, p. 9.}
-\defpnote{1.38}{Ibid., p. 27.}
-\defpnote{1.39}{Ibid., pp. 29--30.}
-\defpnote{1.40}{G.C. Field, \booktitle{Plato and His Contemporaries: A Study in Fourth-Century Life and Thought} (London: Methuen \& Co., Ltd., 1930), p. 68.}
-\defpnote{1.41}{Ross has summarized these results in tabular
-form: see Appendix A.}
-\defpnote{1.42}{A.E. Taylor, \essaytitle{Plato,} \booktitle{Encyclopaedia Britannica},
-pp. 48--64.}
-\defpnote{1.43}{Field, op. cit., p. 4.}
-\defpnote{1.44}{According to Field, Plato's benefactor was
-Archytas (Field, op. cit., p. 16), but according to
-Gompers it was Anniceria (Gompers, op. cit., p. 261).}
-\defpnote{1.45}{Field, op. cit., p. 18.}
-\defpnote{1.46}{Gompers, op, cit., p. 261.}
-\defpnote{1.47}{Ritter,
-\booktitle{The Essence of Plato's Philosophy},
-pp. 21--22.}
-\defpnote{1.48}{Ibid., p. 22.}
-\defpnote{1.49}{Ibid., p. 23.}
-\defpnote{1.50}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{1.51}{Ibid., p. 24.}
-\defpnote{1.52}{Ibid., p. 25.}
-\defpnote{1.53}{Ibid., pe 26.}
-\defpnote{1.54}{Ibid., p. 27.}
-\defpnote{1.55}{Ritter op. cit., pp. 329 ff.;
-\booktitle{Untersuchungen uber Platon}
-(Stutheeres 1888), pp. 88 ff.}
-\defpnote{1.56}{J. Harward, \booktitle{The Platonic Epistles} (Cambridge:
-The University Press, 1932).}
-\defpnote{1.57}{Harward, op, cit., p. 60.}
-\defpnote{1.58}{B. Jowett,
-\booktitle{The Dialogues of Plato}
-(3\textsuperscript{rd} ed.; New York: Scribner, Armstrong, \& Co., 1878) preface.}
-\defpnote{1.59}{H.T. Karsten,
-\booktitle{De Epistolis quae feruntur Platonicis}
-(Utrecht: 1864), in Harward, op, cit., p. 61.}
-\defpnote{1.60}{Harward, op. cit., pp. 71--72.}
-\defpnote{1.61}{Field, op. cit., p. 16.}
-\defpnote{1.62}{Harward, op. cit., p. 76.}
-\defpnote{1.63}{Ibid., pp. 86--96.}
-\defpnote{1.64}{Ibid., p. 86.}
-\defpnote{1.65}{Ritter,
-\booktitle{Neue Untersuchungen uber Platon}, p. 408.}
-\defpnote{1.66}{\booktitle{Tusc, Disp.} V, 35, in Harward, op. cit., p. 189.}
-\defpnote{1.67}{Harward, op. cit., p. 192.}
-\defpnote{1.68}{Not \e{learned.} Plato is talking about the
-communication of philosophy, not the stating of it, nor
-the acquisition of it, but the process in which, so to
-speak, philosophy happens.}
-\defpnote{1.69}{See the Cave Allegory of the \booktitle{Republic} 507.}
-\defpnote{1.70}{i.e., it is in all probability not a posthumous
-edition.}
-
-% ch iii
-% ch iv
-
-
-\defpnote{2.1}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Plato: The Man and His Work}, p. 2.}
-\defpnote{2.2}{Cornford, \booktitle{Plato's Cosmology}, p. 2.}
-
-\defpnote{2.3}{Gauss, \booktitle{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den Dialogen Platos}, p. 157}
-\defpnote{2.4}{Cornford, op. cit., appendix, p. 365.}
-\defpnote{2.5}{P. Frutiger, \booktitle{Les Myths de Platon}, (Paris: 1930), pp. 244 ff.}
-
-\defpnote{2.6}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 14.}
-
-\defpnote{2.7}{Q. Lauer, S.J., \essaytitle{The Being of Non-Being in Plato's Sophist} (unpublished manuscript; New York: Fordham University).}
-
-\defpnote{2.8}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 8.}
-
-\defpnote{2.9}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Plato: The Man and His Work}, p. 440.}
-\defpnote{2.10}{Cf., V.J. Gioscia, \essaytitle{A Perspective for Role Theory,} \journaltitle{The American Catholic Sociological Review,} XXII, 2 (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1961), pp. 143 ff.}
-
-\defpnote{2.11}{Cornford, op. cit., p. 24.}
-
-\defpnote{2.12}{Ibid., p. 28.}
-\defpnote{2.13}{Ibid., p. 30.}
-
-\defpnote{2.14}{Ibid., pp. 31--32.}
-
-\defpnote{2.15}{R.D. Archer-Hind, \booktitle{Commentary on the Timaeus}, (London: The Macmillan Company, 1888), p. 86, n, 14.}
-
-\defpnote{2.16}{T.T. Taylor, \booktitle{The Timaeus and Critias of Plato},
-(Washington: Pantheon Books Inc., 1952), p. 112. }
-
-\defpnote{2.17}{Ibid., p. 17.}
-
-\defpnote{2.18}{Bury, \booktitle{Plato and History},\ednote{book or essay?} p. 5.}
-
-\defpnote{2.19}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 73.}
-
-\defpnote{2.20}{Ibid.}
-\defpnote{2.21}{Ibid., p. 74.}
-\defpnote{2.22}{Ibid.}
-
-\defpnote{2.23}{Ibid., p. 19.}
-\defpnote{2.24}{Cornford, op. cit., p. x.}
-\defpnote{2.25}{Ibid., pp. 11--12.}
-
-% ch 5
-\defpnote{3.1}{Cornford, \booktitle{Plato's Cosmology}, p. 31.}
-
-\defpnote{3.2}{One is tempted to restore the hiatus which Cornford habitually tries to remove as \dq{intolerable.} Then the passage would read, \dq{he desired that all things should come as near as possible to being, like himself.}}
-
-\defpnote{3.3}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 37.}
-
-\defpnote{3.4}{Ibid., p. 78.}
-
-\defpnote{3.5}{T.T. Taylor,
-\booktitle{The Timaeus and Critias of Plato}, pp. 29 ff.}
-
-\defpnote{3.6}{e.g., Alexandre Koyre, \booktitle{From the Closed World to the
-Infinite Universe}, (New York: Harper \& Brothers, 1958).}
-
-\defpnote{3.7}{E.R. Dodds, \booktitle{The Greeks and the Irrational}
-(Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).}
-
-\defpnote{3.8}{George S. Claghorn, \booktitle{Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's
-\sq{Timaeus}} (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1954), p. 87.}
-
-\defpnote{3.9}{Cornford, op, cit., p. 59.}
-\defpnote{3.10}{Ibid., p. 61.}
-\defpnote{3.11}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 128.}
-
-\defpnote{3.12}{Cornford, loc. cit., "Kinds" is a peculiar expression which is repeated here only to assure an accurate representation of Cornford's view.}
-
-\defpnote{3.13}{T.T. Taylor, op. cit., \essaytitle{Introduction.}}
-\defpnote{3.14}{According to T.T. Taylor, loc. cit.}
-\defpnote{3.15}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, Appendix.}
-\defpnote{3.16}{Heisenberg, \booktitle{Physics and Philosophy}, ch. 4. See
-also MacKinnon, \booktitle{Time in Contemporary Physics}, pp. 428--457.}
-
-\defpnote{3.17}{Dodds, op. cit.}
-\defpnote{3.18}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, p. 113.}
-
-\defpnote{3.19}{A.E. Taylor, Cornford, Archer-Hind, Bury.}
-
-\defpnote{3.20}{Cornford has \dq{So.}}
-
-\defpnote{3.21}{Cornford, op. cit.}
-
-\defpnote{3.22}{They do not really wander; see \booktitle{Laws} 822a.}
-\defpnote{3.23}{Cornford has \dq{circuits.}}
-
-% ch6
-
-{4.1}{For example, in his chapter on the doctrine of the
-Timaeus, Ross (W.D. Ross, \booktitle{Plato's Theory of Ideas}
-(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951).) discusses the role of
-Time not at all.}
-
-{4.2}{Gauss, \booktitle{Philosophischer Handkommentar zu den
-Dialogen Platos}, p. 157.}
-
-
-
-{4.3}{Jowett, \booktitle{The Dialogues of Plato}, II, pp. 456--7.}
-
-{4.4}{Bury, \essaytitle{Plato and History,}\ednote{essay or book?} p. 5.}
-
-{4.5}{Walsh, \booktitle{Plato and the Philosophy of History}. See
-also Barker, \booktitle{Political thought of Plato and Aristotle},
-Nettleship, \booktitle{Lectures on the Republic of Plato},
-Popper, \booktitle{The Open Society and its Enemies}, and numerous
-anthologies which present Plato's \booktitle{Republic} but seldom if
-ever present the \booktitle{Timaeus}.}
-
-{4.6}{A.E. Taylor, \booktitle{Commentary}, pp. 689 ff.}
-{4.7}{J.F. Callahan, \booktitle{Four Views of Time in Ancient
-Philosophy} (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1948),
-rightly says that A.E. Taylor errs here because of his
-adoption of Aristotle's notion of Time.}
-
-{4.8}{There are several aspects of Plato's discussion
-of Time and Society which bear a marked resemblance to
-some aspects of the philosophy of Anaximander, but a
-discription of these similarities and differences would
-require a lengthy discussion which would take us into
-the origin of Plato's doctrines, whereas it is only our
-purpose here to present and examine Plato's doctrine.
-For example, while it would be instructive to investigate
-the extent of Plato's indebtedness to Anaximander's
-dark saying about the reparation which things offer in
-Time for their injustices, (see, for example, John
-Burnet, \booktitle{Early Greek Philosophy} (4\textsuperscript{th} ed.; London: Adam
-and Charles Black; New York: Tne Macmillan Co., 1930),
-pp. 52--53.) it would necessitate more comment than
-we have room to present here.}
-
-% appendix
-{A.1}{W.D. Ross, \booktitle{Plato's Theory of Ideas} (Oxford:
-Clarendon Press, 1951), p. 2.} \ No newline at end of file