From 6098d184521764cbd29b682605b0455df7f558d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grr <grr@lo2.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:27:13 -0400
Subject: pile of work-in-progress-crud

---
 extra/repressed_content.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'extra/repressed_content.tex')

diff --git a/extra/repressed_content.tex b/extra/repressed_content.tex
index 511125c..125a4e4 100644
--- a/extra/repressed_content.tex
+++ b/extra/repressed_content.tex
@@ -332,8 +332,8 @@ When is an a priori conceptual system (embodied in language) considered to be es
 \item Can a logic based in psychology account for the difference between `2 exists' and `a square root of 4 exists'? No!
 \end{itemize}
 
-When is a meaning brought into objective existence? When does a public object acquire a structure absolutely inherent in it? (Looking at the following figure,
-\parbox{4in}{{\centering\includegraphics{img/strokes}\par}}
+When is a meaning brought into objective existence? When does a public object acquire a structure absolutely inherent in it? (Looking at the following figure,\\
+\parbox{4in}{{\centering\vskip 0.7em \includegraphics[width=3in]{img/strokes}\vskip 0.7em\par}} \\
 are there two groups of three, or four sets of singles and pairs?\footnote{Or, much worse, are there three bracketed gaps?})
 
 And, how does this interact with the compulsion to recognize that a derivation is legal?
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

