From 6098d184521764cbd29b682605b0455df7f558d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: grr Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:27:13 -0400 Subject: pile of work-in-progress-crud --- extra/repressed_content.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'extra/repressed_content.tex') diff --git a/extra/repressed_content.tex b/extra/repressed_content.tex index 511125c..125a4e4 100644 --- a/extra/repressed_content.tex +++ b/extra/repressed_content.tex @@ -332,8 +332,8 @@ When is an a priori conceptual system (embodied in language) considered to be es \item Can a logic based in psychology account for the difference between `2 exists' and `a square root of 4 exists'? No! \end{itemize} -When is a meaning brought into objective existence? When does a public object acquire a structure absolutely inherent in it? (Looking at the following figure, -\parbox{4in}{{\centering\includegraphics{img/strokes}\par}} +When is a meaning brought into objective existence? When does a public object acquire a structure absolutely inherent in it? (Looking at the following figure,\\ +\parbox{4in}{{\centering\vskip 0.7em \includegraphics[width=3in]{img/strokes}\vskip 0.7em\par}} \\ are there two groups of three, or four sets of singles and pairs?\footnote{Or, much worse, are there three bracketed gaps?}) And, how does this interact with the compulsion to recognize that a derivation is legal? -- cgit v1.2.3