From 9764e72e035adf29ba87734c1f4a88e4dfe141e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grr <grr@lo2.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:21:13 -0400
Subject: sec5 shouldnt be in toc

---
 extra/communists_must.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'extra/communists_must.tex')

diff --git a/extra/communists_must.tex b/extra/communists_must.tex
index 206f5ce..8ee41d4 100644
--- a/extra/communists_must.tex
+++ b/extra/communists_must.tex
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Two topics particularly need study. The most important is: Culture as the instru
 
 Top published studies of the finances of culture are Francis Haskell's \uline{Patrons and Painters: A Study in the Relations Between Italian Art and Society In the Age of the Baroque}; investment banker Richard H. Rush's \uline{Art As An Investment}; and bourgeois critic Harold Rosenberg's \enquote{The Art Establishment}, in Esquire, January 1965; because they elaborate with Machiavellian frankness on the relation of culture to the ruling class, for a large area of culture. These revealing studies need only be placed in context to have revolutionary implications. Unpublished material of mine which I am collecting under the title \uline{Class and the Development of Culture} will provide an adequate general theory of culture. 
 
-\section{5}
+\section*{5}
 
 In many cases a reference to one of Conditions A--C has been a sufficient argument for revolutionary leadership. For example, a reference to Condition A is a sufficient argument for prefabricated architecture. 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

