From 488959552c345ba7686f499707f17756a6bb75b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:54:46 -0400
Subject: clean up some probably misguided ideas about document splitting

---
 essays/some_objections.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'essays/some_objections.tex')

diff --git a/essays/some_objections.tex b/essays/some_objections.tex
index 4d49830..ff4b8f0 100644
--- a/essays/some_objections.tex
+++ b/essays/some_objections.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\Chp{Some Objections to My Philosophy}
+\chapter{Some Objections to My Philosophy}
 
 \begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{\Alph*.}, wide, nosep, itemsep=1em]
 \item The predominant attitude toward philosophical questions in educated circles today derives from the later Wittgenstein. Consider the philosopher's question of whether other people have minds. The Wittgensteinian attitude is that in ordinary usage, statements which imply that other people have minds are not problematic. Everybody knows that other people have minds. To doubt that other people have minds, as a philosopher might do, is simply to misuse ordinary language.\footnote{See \booktitle{Philosophical Investigations}, \S 420.} Statements which imply that other people have minds works perfectly well in the context for which they were intended. When philosophers find these statements problematic, it is because they subject the statements to criticism by logical standards which are irrelevant and extraneous to ordinary usage.\footnote{\S \S 402, 412, 119, 116.}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

