<html><head><meta name="color-scheme" content="light dark"></head><body><pre style="word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;">From da4c2f772d5b8b9ad6a4f5e384edd919f1bee214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins &lt;pjenkins@tula-health.com&gt;
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:56:50 -0400
Subject: header structure for esthetics, para-science, re-include and fix post
 formalism

---
 essays/post_formalism_memories.tex | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'essays/post_formalism_memories.tex')

diff --git a/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex b/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex
index 73477a5..0c867a2 100644
--- a/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex
+++ b/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex
@@ -3,8 +3,12 @@
 
 
 \chapter{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}
+ 
 \section{Post-Formalist Mathematics}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Post-Formalist Mathematics}}
+
 Over the last hundred years, a philosophy of pure mathematics has 
 grown up which I prefer to call \enquote{formalism.} As Willard Quine says in the 
 fourth section of his essay "Carnap and Logical Truth,' formalism was 
@@ -22,14 +26,18 @@ innovations.
 
 The formalist position goes as follows. Pure mathematics is the 
 manipulation of the meaningless and arbitrary, but typographically 
-well-defined ink-shapes on paper `$w$,' `$x$,' `$y$,' `$z$,' `$'$,' `$($,' `$)$,' `$\downarrow$,' and `$\in$.' 
-These shapes are manipulated according to arbitrary but well-detined 
+well-defined ink-shapes on paper 
+`$w$,' `$x$,' `$y$,' `$z$,' 
+`\texttt{'},' 
+`$($,' `$)$,' 
+`$\downarrow$,' and `$\in$.' 
+These shapes are manipulated according to arbitrary but well-defined 
 mechanical rules. Actually, the rules mimic the structure of primitive 
 systems such as Euclid's geometry. There are formation rules, mechanical 
 definitions of which concatenations of shapes are \enquote{\term{sentences}.} One sentence 
 is `$((x) (x\in x) \downarrow (x) (x\in x))$.' There are transformation rules, rules for the 
 mechanical derivation of sentences from other sentences. The best known 
-trasformation rule is the rule that $\psi$ may be concluded from $\varphi$ and 
+transformation rule is the rule that $\psi$ may be concluded from $\varphi$ and 
 $\ulcorner \varphi \supset \psi \urcorner$; 
 where `$\supset$' is the truth-functional conditional. For later convenience, I will 
 say that $\varphi$ and $\ulcorner \varphi \supset \psi \urcorner$ are \enquote{\term{impliors},} 
@@ -406,6 +414,7 @@ beyond the reach of past mathematics.
 
 \clearpage
 \section{Constructed Memory Systems}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{2. Constructed Memory Systems}}
 
 In order to understand this section, it is necessary to be thoroughly 
 familiar with \essaytitle{Studies in Constructed Memories,} the essay following this 
@@ -669,7 +678,8 @@ Knows What's Going On.} One just has to guess whether this system exists,
 and if it does what it is like.\editornote{The appendix contains a presentation of this work.} The preceding remark is the 
 metametamathematical description, or definition, of the system. 
 
-\subsection{Epilogue}
+\section{Epilogue}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{3. Epilogue}}
 
 Ever since Carnap's Principle of Tolerance opened the floodgates to 
 arbitrariness in mathematics, we have been faced with the prospect of a 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

</pre></body></html>