From e19cd38239a9c0cf5c58ef1b7c6e5ced4d3e3b34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 01:06:26 -0400
Subject: this is the gameplan

---
 essays/philosophical_reflections.tex | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

(limited to 'essays/philosophical_reflections.tex')

diff --git a/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex b/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
index 091cd7a..987c51c 100644
--- a/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
+++ b/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{Philosophical Reflections I}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Philosophy}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textsc{Philosophical Reflections I}}
+
 \begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{\Alph*.}, wide, nosep, itemsep=1em]
 \item If language is nonsense, why do we seem to have it? How do these intricate pseudo-significant structures arise? If beliefs are self-deceiving, why are they there? Why are we so skilled in the self-deceptive reflex that I find in language and belief? Why are we so fluent in thinking in self-vitiating concepts? Granting that language and belief are mistakes, are mistakes of this degree of complexity made for nothing? Is not the very ability to concoct an apparently significant, self-vitiating and self-deceiving structure a transcendent ability, one that points to something non-immediate? Do not these conceptual gymnastics, even if self-vitiating, make us superior to the mindless animals? 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

