From a663774c5694aceddc419833ec79b44084af49a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: grr Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 09:14:50 -0400 Subject: <-- --- essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex') diff --git a/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex b/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex index 0eda09e..31fe124 100644 --- a/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex +++ b/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ is no way to "go back before the natural language." As we mentioned before, the aphorism that "saying a thing is so doesn't make it so" is an example of the natural language's semantics in the natural language. -in summary, the crucial assertion is the assertion that there is language, +In summary, the crucial assertion is the assertion that there is language, made in the natural language. This assertion is true if it is meaningful. It is too true; it must be a definitional trick. Beliefs stand or fall on the question of whether there is language. There is no way to get outside the definitional -- cgit v1.2.3