From a663774c5694aceddc419833ec79b44084af49a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grr <grr@lo2.org>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 09:14:50 -0400
Subject: <--

---
 essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex')

diff --git a/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex b/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex
index 0eda09e..31fe124 100644
--- a/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex
+++ b/essays/flaws_underlying_beliefs.tex
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ is no way to "go back before the natural language." As we mentioned
 before, the aphorism that "saying a thing is so doesn't make it so" is an 
 example of the natural language's semantics in the natural language. 
 
-in summary, the crucial assertion is the assertion that there is language, 
+In summary, the crucial assertion is the assertion that there is language, 
 made in the natural language. This assertion is true if it is meaningful. It is 
 too true; it must be a definitional trick. Beliefs stand or fall on the question 
 of whether there is language. There is no way to get outside the definitional 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

