From da4c2f772d5b8b9ad6a4f5e384edd919f1bee214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:56:50 -0400
Subject: header structure for esthetics, para-science, re-include and fix post
 formalism

---
 essays/dissociation_physics.tex | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

(limited to 'essays/dissociation_physics.tex')

diff --git a/essays/dissociation_physics.tex b/essays/dissociation_physics.tex
index 5badaf1..4fad12d 100644
--- a/essays/dissociation_physics.tex
+++ b/essays/dissociation_physics.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{The Perception-Dissociation of Physics}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Para-Science}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{The Perception-Dissociation of Physics}}
+
 From the physicist's point of view, the human dichotomy of sight and touch is a coincidence. It does not correspond to any dichotomy in the objective physical world. Light exerts pressure, and substances hot to the touch emit infrared light. It is just that the range of human receptors is too limited for them to register the tactile effect of light or the visual effect of moderate temperatures. 
 
 Our problem is to determine what observations or experiences would cause the physicist to say that the objective physical world had split along the human sight-touch boundary, to say that the human sight-touch dichotomy was an unavoidable model of objective physical reality. Our discussion is not about perfectly transparent matter, or light reflection and emission in the absence of matter, or the dissociation of electromagnetic and inertial phenomena, or the fact that human sight registers light, while touch registers inertia, bulk modulus, thermal conduction, friction, adhesion, and so on. (However, these concepts may have to be introduced to complete our discussion.) Our discussion is about a change in the physicist's observations or experiences, such that the anomalous state of affairs would be an experimental analogue to the sight-touch dichotomy of philosophical subjectivism. Of course, philosophical subjectivism itself will not enter the discussion. 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

