From da4c2f772d5b8b9ad6a4f5e384edd919f1bee214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:56:50 -0400
Subject: header structure for esthetics, para-science, re-include and fix post
 formalism

---
 essays/art_or_brend.tex | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

(limited to 'essays/art_or_brend.tex')

diff --git a/essays/art_or_brend.tex b/essays/art_or_brend.tex
index 99209fc..b86a852 100644
--- a/essays/art_or_brend.tex
+++ b/essays/art_or_brend.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{\textsc{Art} or \textsc{Brend}?}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Esthetics}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Art or Brend?}}
+
 \begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{\arabic*.}, wide, itemsep=1em]
 \item Perhaps the most diseased justification the artist can give of his profession is to say that it is somehow scientific. LaMonte Young, Milton Babbitt, and Stockhausen are exponents of this sort of justification. 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

