From 3d2ad7a714c4cda5ce08af6756f10941bd781d71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoebe jenkins <pjenkins@tula-health.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 20:54:31 -0400
Subject: fix some quotes

---
 essays/art_or_brend.tex | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

(limited to 'essays/art_or_brend.tex')

diff --git a/essays/art_or_brend.tex b/essays/art_or_brend.tex
index ef758d7..89f115a 100644
--- a/essays/art_or_brend.tex
+++ b/essays/art_or_brend.tex
@@ -16,18 +16,18 @@ advance? Differential geometry is a deductive analysis of abstract relations
 and an outstanding mathematical theory. ts the work of art such an 
 analysis? 
 
-The motives behind the "scientific" justification of art are utterly sinister. 
+The motives behind the \enquote{scientific} justification of art are utterly sinister. 
 Perhaps LaMonte Young is merely rationalizing because he wants an 
 academic job. But Babbitt is out to reduce music to a pedantic 
-pseudo-science. And Stockhausen, with his "scientific music", intends 
-nothing less than the suppression of the culture of "lower classes" and 
-"ower races." 
+pseudo-science. And Stockhausen, with his \enquote{scientific music}, intends 
+nothing less than the suppression of the culture of \enquote{lower classes} and 
+\enquote{ower races.} 
 
 It is the creative personality himself who has the most reason to object to 
-the "scientific" justification of art. Again and again, the decisive step in 
+the \enquote{scientific} justification of art. Again and again, the decisive step in 
 artistic development has come when an artist produces a work that shatters 
 all existing 'scientific' laws of art, and yet is more important to the 
-audience than all the works that "obey" the laws. 
+audience than all the works that \enquote{obey} the laws. 
 
 \item The artist or entertainer cannot exist without urging his product on other 
 people. In fact, after developing his product, the artist goes out and tries to 
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ the distinguishing features of art has always been that it is very difficult to
 defend art without referring to people's liking or enjoying it. (Functions of 
 art such as making money or glorifying the social order are real enough, but 
 they are rarely cited in defense of art. Let us put them aside.) When one 
-artist shows his latest production to another, all he can usually ask is "Do 
-you like it?" Once the "scientific" justification of art is discredited, the 
+artist shows his latest production to another, all he can usually ask is \enquote{Do 
+you like it?} Once the \enquote{scientific} justification of art is discredited, the 
 artist usually has to admit: If you don't like or enjoy my product, there's no 
-reason why you should "consume" it. 
+reason why you should \enquote{consume} it. 
 
 There are exceptions. Art sometimes becomes the sole channel for political 
 dissent, the sole arena in which oppressive social relations can be 
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ connection with people's liking, yet the artist expects the objects to find
 their value in people's liking them. To be totally successful, the object would 
 have to give you an experience in which the object is as personal to you as 
 your valuing of it. Yet you remain aware that the object is another's 
-product, separable from your liking of it. The artist tries to "be oneself" for 
-other people, to "express oneself" for them. 
+product, separable from your liking of it. The artist tries to \enquote{be oneself} for 
+other people, to \enquote{express oneself} for them. 
 
 \item There are experiences for each person which accomplish what art and 
 entertainment fail to. The purpose of this essay is to make you aware of 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

