summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'essays/philosophical_reflections.tex')
-rw-r--r--essays/philosophical_reflections.tex2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex b/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
index 987c51c..0915be0 100644
--- a/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
+++ b/essays/philosophical_reflections.tex
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
\chapter{Philosophical Reflections I}
\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
-\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Philosophy}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textsc{Philosophical Reflections I}}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Philosophy}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Philosophical Reflections I}}
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{\Alph*.}, wide, nosep, itemsep=1em]
\item If language is nonsense, why do we seem to have it? How do these intricate pseudo-significant structures arise? If beliefs are self-deceiving, why are they there? Why are we so skilled in the self-deceptive reflex that I find in language and belief? Why are we so fluent in thinking in self-vitiating concepts? Granting that language and belief are mistakes, are mistakes of this degree of complexity made for nothing? Is not the very ability to concoct an apparently significant, self-vitiating and self-deceiving structure a transcendent ability, one that points to something non-immediate? Do not these conceptual gymnastics, even if self-vitiating, make us superior to the mindless animals?