summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/essays/mathematical_studies.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'essays/mathematical_studies.tex')
-rw-r--r--essays/mathematical_studies.tex38
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/essays/mathematical_studies.tex b/essays/mathematical_studies.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..99256d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/essays/mathematical_studies.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+\chapter{1966 Mathematical Studies: Introduction}
+
+Pure mathematics is the one activity which is intrinsically formalistic. It
+is the one activity which brings out the practical value of formal
+manipulations. Abstract games fit in perfectly with the tradition and
+rationale of pure mathematics; whereas they would not be appropriate in
+any other discipline. Pure mathematics is the one activity which can
+appropriately develop through innovations of a formalistic character.
+
+Precisely because pure mathematics does not have to be immediately
+practical, there is no intrinsic reason why it should adhere to the normal
+concept of logical truth. No harm is done if the mathematician chooses to
+play a game which is indeterminate by normal logical standards. All that
+matters is that the mathematician clearly specify the rules of his game, and
+that he not make claims for his results which are inconsistent with his rules.
+
+Actually, my pure philosophical writings discredit the concept of
+logical truth by showing that there are flaws inherent in all non-trivial
+language. Thus, no mathematics has the logical validity which was once
+claimed for mathematics. From the ultimate philosophical standpoint, all
+mathematics is as "indeterminate" as the mathematics in this monograph.
+All the more reason, then, not to limit mathematics to the normal concept
+of logical truth.
+
+Once it is realized that mathematics is intrinsically formalistic, and need
+not adhere to the normal concept of logical truth, why hold back from
+exploring the possibilities which are available? There is every reason to
+search out the possibilities and present them. Such is the purpose of this
+monograph.
+
+The ultimate test of the non-triviality of pure mathematics is whether it
+has practical applications. I believe that the approaches presented on a very
+abstract level in this monograph will turn out to have such applications. In
+order to be applied, the principles which are presented here have to be
+developed intensively on a level which is compatible with applications. The
+results will be found in my two subsequent essays, \essaytitle{Subjective Propositional
+Vibration} and \essaytitle{The Logic of Admissible Contradictions}.
+