bunch of other little fixes

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex b/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
index e95b85f..875ba55 100644
--- a/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
+++ b/essays/admissible_contradictions.tex
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The task of the theory is to determine whether the admissibility of the
 cons postulated to be am implies the admissibility of any other cons. The 
 method we have developed for solving such problems will be expressed as a 
 collection of posiulates for our theory. 
-
+\begin{hangers}
 \postulate{1} Given $\varphi[(x\in A),(x\in B),\ldots]$ am, where $x\in A$, $x\in B$, ... are the 
 restrictions on the con parameter, and given $A_1\subset A$, $B_1\subset B$, ..., where $A_1,B_1,...\neq\emptyset$, then 
 $\varphi[(x\in A_1),(x\in B_1),...]$ is am. This postulate is obviously 
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ $C=A_1\cup B_1\cup\ldots$ .)
 parameters $x$ and $y$ is am if it satisfies the postulated requirements 
 concerning amcons on $x$ and the postulated requirements concerning amcons 
 on $y$. 
+\end{hangers}
 
 The effect of all our assumptions up to now is to make parameters 
 totally independent. They do not interact with each other at all.