header structure for esthetics, para-science, re-include and fix post formalism

8 files changed, 37 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/blueprint.tex b/blueprint.tex
index ac7851a..9f97ac0 100644
--- a/blueprint.tex
+++ b/blueprint.tex
@@ -185,10 +185,10 @@ colophon goes here
 % \input{extra/poem_1.tex}
 % \input{extra/poem_4.tex}
 
-\part{Para-science}
+\part{Para-Science}
 \input{essays/dissociation_physics.tex}
 \input{essays/mathematical_studies.tex}
-% \input{essays/post_formalism_memories.tex}
+\input{essays/post_formalism_memories.tex}
 \input{essays/studies_in_constructed_memories.tex}
 
 \part{The New Modality}
diff --git a/essays/art_or_brend.tex b/essays/art_or_brend.tex
index 99209fc..b86a852 100644
--- a/essays/art_or_brend.tex
+++ b/essays/art_or_brend.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{\textsc{Art} or \textsc{Brend}?}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Esthetics}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Art or Brend?}}
+
 \begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{\arabic*.}, wide, itemsep=1em]
 \item Perhaps the most diseased justification the artist can give of his profession is to say that it is somehow scientific. LaMonte Young, Milton Babbitt, and Stockhausen are exponents of this sort of justification. 
 
diff --git a/essays/dissociation_physics.tex b/essays/dissociation_physics.tex
index 5badaf1..4fad12d 100644
--- a/essays/dissociation_physics.tex
+++ b/essays/dissociation_physics.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{The Perception-Dissociation of Physics}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Para-Science}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{The Perception-Dissociation of Physics}}
+
 From the physicist's point of view, the human dichotomy of sight and touch is a coincidence. It does not correspond to any dichotomy in the objective physical world. Light exerts pressure, and substances hot to the touch emit infrared light. It is just that the range of human receptors is too limited for them to register the tactile effect of light or the visual effect of moderate temperatures. 
 
 Our problem is to determine what observations or experiences would cause the physicist to say that the objective physical world had split along the human sight-touch boundary, to say that the human sight-touch dichotomy was an unavoidable model of objective physical reality. Our discussion is not about perfectly transparent matter, or light reflection and emission in the absence of matter, or the dissociation of electromagnetic and inertial phenomena, or the fact that human sight registers light, while touch registers inertia, bulk modulus, thermal conduction, friction, adhesion, and so on. (However, these concepts may have to be introduced to complete our discussion.) Our discussion is about a change in the physicist's observations or experiences, such that the anomalous state of affairs would be an experimental analogue to the sight-touch dichotomy of philosophical subjectivism. Of course, philosophical subjectivism itself will not enter the discussion. 
diff --git a/essays/letters.tex b/essays/letters.tex
index 7cc781e..9dcd533 100644
--- a/essays/letters.tex
+++ b/essays/letters.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{Letters}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Esthetics}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Letters}}
+
 \section{Letter from Terry Riley, Paris, to Henry Flynt, Cambridge, Mass., \\ dated 11/8/62}
 
 One day a little boy got up and looked at his toys, appraised them and decided they were of no value to him so he did them in. Seeing that others were blindly and blissfully enjoying theirs he offered them a long and \enquote{radical new theory} of \enquote{pure recreation} for their enjoyment but before he let them in for this highly secret and \enquote{revolutionary theory} they should follow his example and partake of a little 20th C. iconoclasm. From those that balked he removed the label \enquote{avant-garde} and attached the label \enquote{traditionalist} or if they were already labeled \enquote{traditionalist} he added one more star. If they accepted they got a \enquote{hip} rating with gold cluster and if they comprehended the worth of his theory well enough to destroy their own art they would be awarded assignments to destroy those works whose designers were no longer around to speak out in their behalf. 
diff --git a/essays/mathematical_studies.tex b/essays/mathematical_studies.tex
index bfae1b5..ffb914b 100644
--- a/essays/mathematical_studies.tex
+++ b/essays/mathematical_studies.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{1966 Mathematical Studies: Introduction}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Mathematical Studies (1966)}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Introduction}}
+
 Pure mathematics is the one activity which is intrinsically formalistic. It is the one activity which brings out the practical value of formal manipulations. Abstract games fit in perfectly with the tradition and rationale of pure mathematics; whereas they would not be appropriate in any other discipline. Pure mathematics is the one activity which can appropriately develop through innovations of a formalistic character. 
 
 Precisely because pure mathematics does not have to be immediately practical, there is no intrinsic reason why it should adhere to the normal concept of logical truth. No harm is done if the mathematician chooses to play a game which is indeterminate by normal logical standards. All that matters is that the mathematician clearly specify the rules of his game, and that he not make claims for his results which are inconsistent with his rules. 
diff --git a/essays/photos.tex b/essays/photos.tex
index 2b5e6a9..7bb8141 100644
--- a/essays/photos.tex
+++ b/essays/photos.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{Protest Photographs}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Esthetics}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Protest Photographs}}
+
 \photopage{img/nomoreart01}{2/22/1963}{Henry Flynt and Jack Smith demonstrate against Lincoln Center, February 22, 1963}{Tony Conrad}
 
 \photopage{img/nomoreart02}{2/22/1963}{Henry Flynt and Tony Conrad demonstrate against the Metropolitan Museum of Art, February 22, 1963}{Jack Smith}
diff --git a/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex b/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex
index 73477a5..0c867a2 100644
--- a/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex
+++ b/essays/post_formalism_memories.tex
@@ -3,8 +3,12 @@
 
 
 \chapter{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}
+ 
 \section{Post-Formalist Mathematics}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{Post-Formalist Mathematics}}
+
 Over the last hundred years, a philosophy of pure mathematics has 
 grown up which I prefer to call \enquote{formalism.} As Willard Quine says in the 
 fourth section of his essay "Carnap and Logical Truth,' formalism was 
@@ -22,14 +26,18 @@ innovations.
 
 The formalist position goes as follows. Pure mathematics is the 
 manipulation of the meaningless and arbitrary, but typographically 
-well-defined ink-shapes on paper `$w$,' `$x$,' `$y$,' `$z$,' `$'$,' `$($,' `$)$,' `$\downarrow$,' and `$\in$.' 
-These shapes are manipulated according to arbitrary but well-detined 
+well-defined ink-shapes on paper 
+`$w$,' `$x$,' `$y$,' `$z$,' 
+`\texttt{'},' 
+`$($,' `$)$,' 
+`$\downarrow$,' and `$\in$.' 
+These shapes are manipulated according to arbitrary but well-defined 
 mechanical rules. Actually, the rules mimic the structure of primitive 
 systems such as Euclid's geometry. There are formation rules, mechanical 
 definitions of which concatenations of shapes are \enquote{\term{sentences}.} One sentence 
 is `$((x) (x\in x) \downarrow (x) (x\in x))$.' There are transformation rules, rules for the 
 mechanical derivation of sentences from other sentences. The best known 
-trasformation rule is the rule that $\psi$ may be concluded from $\varphi$ and 
+transformation rule is the rule that $\psi$ may be concluded from $\varphi$ and 
 $\ulcorner \varphi \supset \psi \urcorner$; 
 where `$\supset$' is the truth-functional conditional. For later convenience, I will 
 say that $\varphi$ and $\ulcorner \varphi \supset \psi \urcorner$ are \enquote{\term{impliors},} 
@@ -406,6 +414,7 @@ beyond the reach of past mathematics.
 
 \clearpage
 \section{Constructed Memory Systems}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{2. Constructed Memory Systems}}
 
 In order to understand this section, it is necessary to be thoroughly 
 familiar with \essaytitle{Studies in Constructed Memories,} the essay following this 
@@ -669,7 +678,8 @@ Knows What's Going On.} One just has to guess whether this system exists,
 and if it does what it is like.\editornote{The appendix contains a presentation of this work.} The preceding remark is the 
 metametamathematical description, or definition, of the system. 
 
-\subsection{Epilogue}
+\section{Epilogue}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Post-Formalism in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{3. Epilogue}}
 
 Ever since Carnap's Principle of Tolerance opened the floodgates to 
 arbitrariness in mathematics, we have been faced with the prospect of a 
diff --git a/essays/studies_in_constructed_memories.tex b/essays/studies_in_constructed_memories.tex
index d782123..9c370df 100644
--- a/essays/studies_in_constructed_memories.tex
+++ b/essays/studies_in_constructed_memories.tex
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 
 \section{Introduction}
 
+\fancyhead{} \fancyfoot{} \fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Studies in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{1. Introduction}}
+
 The memory of a conscious organism is a phenomenon in which 
 interrelations of mind, language, and the rest of reality are especially evident. 
 In these studies, I will define some conscious memory-systems, and 
@@ -88,6 +91,7 @@ while $A_{a_3}$, remained only a possibility.
 Enough concepts are now at hand for the studies to begin in earnest. 
 
 \section{M-Memories}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Studies in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{2. M-Memories}}
 
 \newcommand{\definition}{\textbf{Definition.}}
 \newcommand{\assumption}[1]{\textit{Assumption #1.}}
@@ -250,6 +254,7 @@ loose, but not arbitrary. And the investigation will become increasingly
 mathematical. 
 
 \section{D-Memories}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Studies in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{3. D-Memories}}
 
 \begin{hangers}
 \definition\ A \term{D-Memory} is a memory such that measured past time 
@@ -407,6 +412,7 @@ to be one of the events for the organism to be aware of the infall.
 \end{hangers}
 
 \section{$\Phi$-Memories}
+\fancyhead[LE]{\textsc{Studies in Constructed Memories}} \fancyhead[RO]{\textit{4. $\Phi$-Memories}}
 I will conclude these studies with two complex constructions. 
 
 \begin{hangers}